In re Marriage of Obrecht Summary
Opinion published on February 24, 2016
Factual Background and Trial Court’s Decision
In Obrecht, a marriage dissolution case, the respondent challenged the trial court's personal jurisdiction over him under the minimum contacts doctrine, while the petitioner cited evidence that the respondent had entered a general appearance before the trial court to contest an award of spousal support. The trial court found respondent made a general appearance.
Decision on Appeal
Because the support order hearing had not been transcribed, the Court of Appeal found that respondent failed to meet his burden of proving that his appearance at the support hearing was not a general appearance. In so holding, the Court of Appeal expressed serious concern about the impact of the trial court's policy not to provide court reporters:
“As illustrated by this case, the absence of a verbatim record can preclude effective appellate review, cloaking the trial court's actions in an impregnable presumption of correctness regardless of what may have actually transpired. Such a regime can raise grave issues of due process as well as equal protection in light of its disparate impact on litigants with limited financial means.... [T]he right to effective appellate review... cannot be permitted to depend entirely on the means of the parties."
Viewing the presentations, articles, other content, or contacting me/you through my web site does not establish an attorney client relationship. I will not file a notice of appeal nor calculate the time in which a notice of appeal must be filed by until I have received a signed retainer agreement. Warning, the time from which to file a notice of appeal is statutory. The time in which you have to appeal may pass between when you first contact me and when an attorney client relationship is formed upon when I receive a signed retainer agreement . Until a retainer agreement is signed and received by me, it is YOUR responsibility to insure your appeal is filed within the statutory period. The articles on this website are not legal advice and should not be used in lieu of an attorney. The accuracy of articles and information on this site cannot be relied upon.